At a dance show last weekend, one of the pieces listed a few outside sources as inspiration. One was a story about Marcel Proust and a friend, who had quarreled over life and art: specifically, about whether an artist should be out and about, living life, or sequestered and dedicating himself to the craft. You can guess which side of the argument Proust, one of history’s most famous recluses, took. I can also imagine the friend’s parting thoughts as he huffed out: “You want to be alone? See if I ever visit you again!” I didn’t keep the playbill and was unable to find the specifics for this story, but that was the gist of it.
This always comes up, doesn’t it? What an artist should and
shouldn’t be doing. Modern manifestations include various articles about how
much social media time is too much for a writer, the classification given to
some “celebrity authors”—those jetsetters who never turn down a conference or
speaking engagement, warnings about the necessity to get your ass in the chair
and write, every day, lest the cogs of your creative engine rust up and jam.
But it also brings to mind the oft-repeated instruction: “Write
what you know.” How are you supposed to know about anything if you’re not
living? Proust had a lot of opinions about a lot of things, most of them
seemingly catered, as opinions are, to his own life. One of his common themes
was that suffering is the root of all great art. He extolled the virtues of
suffering and advised that when it comes, you should give yourself over to it
completely. Distilling sorrow was like an exercise to him:
"When we endeavour to extract the general qualities
from our sorrow and to write about it, we are somewhat consoled...Thinking in
terms of generalities and writing comprise for the writer a healthful and
indispensable function, the fulfilling of which brings happiness, as do for a
man of a physical type exercise, sweating and the bath."
Suffering put you in touch with yourself, he argued, and
made death seem like a release. And most importantly, it fueled the very best
art.
“Works of art, like artesian wells, mount higher in proportion as the suffering has more deeply pierced the heart.”
What do you think? Does a writer need to suffer to write something great, or is empathy enough? How narrow would your writing be if you only wrote of your own experiences? Would it be enough? Where do you find your best inspiration—inside yourself, out in the world, or some combination of both?
